Are you crazy?! Can you not READ?! Everything mentioned on the right hand side is so valid! A corrupt society where the rich are healthy and the poor are dying and people are going around killing babies and stealing old people's hearts! Is THAT the world you wish your grandchildren and their grandchildren etc. to live in? A dark and messed up world like that? With mothers crying to the heavens "Why?! WHY?!" Do YOU want to be responsible for making the world this way? I sure don't. Therefore I, as an intelligent intellectual who happens to care for the future of this world, will opt against legalizing the sale of human organs. And if you have any common sense you will do the same. ALL FOR THE RICH NONE FOR THE POOR If organ selling became legal, only the ones who could afford it would get it. Many cant even afford to go to the dr or buy their medication. Can you imagine, what the cost of organs would be? Open your eyes and look at our gas prices. God forbid anyone who is not wealthy to need a transplant. We should give life to others as it was given to us. Human organs should not be sold on the white market as they should not be sold on the black market. Human organs should be given freely because life is given freely to us. No one pays for their life when they are born. Your mother and father give it to you freely. If an organ is available, it should not go to the highest bidder but the person who needs it the most. We should not monetize organs because the gift of life should not cost you an arm and a leg. No. Its dangerous. You know who's going to be selling their organs? Poor people! They'll be so desperate for money that they'll sell their own kidneys. Well, a kidney. This is just another way for the rich to buy themselves a better life at the expense of the poor. Such a law is dangerous. Has humanity lost its humanity? The very idea of debating whether or not to legalize the sale of human organs is offensive, repugnant, and insane! Has humanity lost its humanity? Have we become carnivores where the strong, the powerful and the rich devour the weak, the poor and helpless vulnerable? If we continue in this path, we shall devour ourselves to extinction sooner than later. The affirmative side is saying "we have a right" when we don't. Tell me where in the Constitution where it says we have a right to do WHATEVER we want with our body. You are presuming we have that right and if an organ can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, no one is going to buy them therefore this plan will not accomplish in saving "many" lives. It's wrong to get money for something you should donate. Your donation can save a life. That's something special, to know you saved a life and didn't ask for anything in return. What if you could save maybe someone's life but they couldn't pay for the organ? What are you going to do? Just let that person die? That's wrong. immoral will only benefit the rich in the long run and could cause the boundary line to break. If organs should be sold whats the difference of a prostitute selling her body for money. It is just a bad idea. If someone want to give an organ it should be out of the goodness in their heart. sale or kidnapping of children from poor families If this law is remouved it will open an entire new section in the black market. People will be kidnaping or selling and buying babies and children, kepping them alive untill full grown and then slaughter them for profit. No one will be asking questions about who its forom because its legal. Don't Sell Human Organs If the sale of human organs becomes legal, a black market will spring up immediately. There are people who will be more than happy to murder others to get access to their organs, either for themselves or to sell on the open market. The extreme protections surrounding the harvesting and transfer of human organs are a good idea and should remain in place. Human organs should not be sold for profit. Human organs should not be a for profit business. They should remain available to patients who need them on a donation basis. Promoting the sale of organs creates a black market in which people's organs are involuntarily harvested. Furthermore, people with extreme financial need may be convinced to sell their organs without fully comprehending the long-term health effects. You can die If a doctor says that you can live without an organ you would want to sell that organ and make money off if it. But what if you need that organ in the future and you need to go on to a 99,000 people waiting list and by the time it is your turn to get that organ you could die. No it shouldn't. I do not believe that the sale of human organs should be legalized. This would open the door to all kinds of unfair and unethical behavior. It would make it hard to impossible for anyone but the rich to have an organ transplant. Lives are at stake here and everyone who needs an organ should have a chance to get one. Why to create a black market and killing people. I don't think that selling of human organ should be legalized. Because for organs people are killing others many people are being killed for there organ many incident always comes in newspaper. I think that government of every country should it and take the black market out of the country. No because... There is no question of a state financed health service being able to afford the prohibitive cost of purchase of organs. It is believed that a single kidney has a black market price of $20,000. Consequently, the sale of organs will condone the most gross discrimination between rich and poor. The opportunity for those unable to afford to purchase to receive a donated organ will be eliminated. Which family, if prepared to donate the organs of a relative, would decide to decline an ex gratia payment of tens of thousands of pounds ?There will not be a twotier market consisting of sale and donation. The donations will disappear and only the rich will survive. No because... It is already apparent that the black market flows in one direction ; from the Third World to the First. The relative absence of regulation, and the comparative value of the rewards means that healthy individuals in Asia and Africa are victim to scavenging organ merchants. The financial rewards make the decision to sell an organ one of compulsion rather than consent.Where colonialists raped the land, the neo-colonialist surgeon steals from bodies. No because... The opportunity for individuals and governments to gain considerable capital for organs sold will lead to appalling human rights violations. Chinese judicial officials are reported to execute prisoners on account of the black market value of their body parts. The lawful sale of organs would legitimise human sacrifice. No because... The sale of organs is a poor solution to a pressing problem. The BMA has proposed a system of ‘presumed consent’. This scheme would allow doctors to assume that the organs of a deceased patient can be used for transplant unless the patient or his family have made a contrary request. Alternatively, the BMA has advocated radical revision of the inefficient system by which patients are matched to donors. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has proposed the development of a website that would link patients, surgeons and donors nationwide. The BMA also envisages the deployment of ‘multi-organ retrieval teams’ led by hospital consultants, in order to ensure that any available organs are not lost from cadaveric donors. No because... The market in body parts that thrives in the United States is neither successful nor to be welcomed. The sale of embryos, eggs and sperm in the United Kingdom is prohibited by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Surrogacy arrangements are not permitted. Blood is collected by voluntary donation. The US regularly suffers the donation of infected blood, given by diseased citizens compelled by the available reward. The paternity and maternity litigation concerning egg and sperm donors, and surrogate mothers is pervasive and persistent. Putting a price on the human body only invites exploitation by the unscrupulous.
