COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 Power Projects Student Internship Week – 2 Design of Grid Connected & Standalone PV Plant Report Create by : Bagus Irawan Saputra [email protected] Page 1 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 Introduction to PV System • Technologies in Solar plant a. Photo-Voltaic Solar Power Plant How PV Solar works? Page 2 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 b. Thermal Solar Power Plant How Thermal Solar works? Page 3 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 c. Concentrated solar Power Plant How Concentrated Solar Power Plant Works? Page 4 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 • Working of PV panel Sunlight injected photons to PV panel on N-type silicon layer, after injecting there are free electrons will flow to hole on P-type silicon. When we put load and closed the loop the current will be flow from N-layer to P-layer. 1. Layers of PV Panel • Top Layer (Aluminium Frame and Tempered Glass) as protection • Two Encapsulant – EVA (between solar cell) to encapsulant solar cell • Back Sheet • Junction Box Page 5 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 2. Spectrum of Solar Radiation 1 2 No. 1 indicated irradiance on space No. 2 Indicated irradiance on atmosphere All the wave length that shows on spectrum cannot use to convert to electricity. Only Visible light use to convert flow of electrons in the Solar panel. Range from 300nm-700nm can be converted to electricity. Page 6 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 • Site & Meteo Site and meteo is particular coordination that show how much irradiation we can receive. We need geographical coordination where PV system will be install (Site Coordination). Solar Panel also get direct irradiation from the sun, diffuse from cloud and reflected from earth surface. • Optimum Orientation Page 7 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 1. Tilt Angle The angle which is tilted accordingly where we can get maximum irradiation in comparing keeping panel in horizontal position. 2. Why we tilt our PV panel? We can absorb more irradiance from the sun by tilting PV panel into some angle. When we set on 0 degree (Global Horizontal Irradiation), we can’t get maximum irradiation as we see the arrow represent the irradiation. But when we tilt the PV panel more than GHI, we will absorb more irradiance. Page 8 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 3. Azimuth Angle Azimuth angle is sun altitude that different with tilt angle. After we tilt PV panel, we arrange PV panel facing on Sun. azimuth angle are different for every building. The orientation of azimuth angle from East-West. • Types of PV System • System Configuration Page 9 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 • System Usage • Installation Type a. Rooftop ( Flat Roof and Tilted Roof) b. Ground Mounted ▪ Fixed Tilt ▪ Seasonal Tilt ▪ Single Axis Tracker (Vertical and Horizontal) ▪ Dual Axis c. Floating 1. Solar Cell, Solar Panel and Solar Array Page 10 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 2. Cell Connecting in Series and Pararel • Solar Cell I-V Characteristic Page 11 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 Page 12 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 • Purpose of Bypass & Blocking Diode • Bypass Diode On picture number one we have 3 panel with 0.5 V each panel and current flow through the circuit. When cloud occurs, it shaded one of the panel and current will not flow through circuit. After getting clouded the panel will be low resistance part. and others panel will send current to shaded panel. It called thermal hotspot that makes heat and damage the panel. On picture number 3 we add bypass diode, when the cloud occurs the current will pass to bypass diode because the diode have less low resistance than shaded panel. So, there are not others panel will send current into shaded panel. Page 13 of 42 • COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 Blocking Diode During day time the PV Panel voltage would be higher that battery voltage. So, current will flow from higher voltage to lower voltage. But in night time, the PV system voltage would be lower than battery. The reverse current will flow from battery to PV system. We add blocking diode to make current flow in one direction. • What is STC ? The Standard Test Conditions for the specification of PV modules are normalised operating conditions when testing the module. They are defined as: - 1000 W/m² - 25°C Irradiance (global when in outdoor conditions). Module temperature, AM 1.5 Spectrum, i.e. a normalised solar spectrum corresponding to the crossing of 1.5 times the "normal" atmosphere (vertical air mass at the sea level). For CPV (concentrating modules), the reference irradiance is specified in terms of DNI value (direct component). Until Spring 2011, it was usually 800 or 850 W/m2 - not always clear. The present convention has fixed it at 1000 W/m². Page 14 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 • PV and Battery Manufactures Battery Automotive Energy Supply Corp. LG Chem Panasonic Samsung SDI Toshiba Amperex Technology (ATL) BAK Group Blue Energy BYD PV Inverter GCL (including GCL Poly and GCL Systems SMA Integration) ABB JinkoSolar Omron JA Solar TMEIC Longi Silicon (including LERRI Solar) Sungrow Hanwha Q CELLS Advanced Energy Wacker Chemie Tabucci Canadian Solar Schneider Electric First Solar Emphase Energy Risen Energy Kaco Daqo New Energy Page 15 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 Hands-on with Pvsyst Preliminary Design (Grid Connected System) Page 16 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 Site Name : Fukui I have been add Fukui Japan Coordination and getting the fix latitude and longitude from database Page 17 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 On Horizon Tab, we can add some shadow data, the red lines able to move to add shadow on sun path, from client and sun path finder. I have been use array specification using nominal power (20 kWp) Changing the tilt and azimuth angle will be increase or decrease energy that we getting from the sun. Page 18 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 I get maximum energy by tilting around 29.83O - 30.00O Transposition Factor : 1.1 Loss With Respect to Optimum : 0 Global on Collector Plane : 1390kWh/m2 Page 19 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 I get maximum energy by set azimuth angle at 0O Transposition Factor : 1.1 Loss With Respect to Optimum : 0 Global on Collector Plane : 1390kWh/m2 Module Type Mounting Technology Vent Properties : Standard : Tilted Roof : Polycrystalline : Semi-Integration Page 20 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 • Result Evaluation Result 1 • Irradiance Plot Note : Brown Bar Color indicates global horizontal energy with 3.5 kWh/m2/day value. Green Bar Color indicates global on tilted energy with 3.8 kWh/m2/day value. We can get more average energy when we tilt panel. Tilt Azimuth Nominal Power Module cost Technology Area Annual Yield Investment 30 deg 0 deg 20 kWp 14459.7 IDR/Wp Polycrystalline 133 m2 23.6 MWh/yr 1106919263 IDR Energy Cost 3216.7 IDR/kWh . Page 21 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 • System Output Energy • Table Output • Table Output Page 22 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 Result 1 ( with add sheds disposition) Choose Sheds Disposition Visualization Collector Band width Top Inactive band width Bottom Inactive band width Pitch Page 23 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 Shed Tilt Optimization Sun Paths Diagram Page 24 of 42 • COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 Irradiance Plot Note : Brown Bar Color indicates global horizontal energy with 3.5 kWh/m2/day value. Green Bar Color indicates global on tilted energy with 3.8 kWh/m2/day value. Purple Bar Color indicates global on tilted energy and shading with 3.7 kWh/m2/day value. Tilt Azimuth Nominal Power Module cost Technology Area Annual Yield Investment 30 deg 0 deg 20 kWp 14459.7 IDR/Wp Polycrystalline 133 m2 22.9 MWh/yr 1106919263 IDR Energy Cost 3216.7 IDR/kWh . Page 25 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 Result 1 ( with add sheds disposition) Choose • Sun – Shield Disposition Visualization Page 26 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 Sun Path Diagram \ • Irradiance Plot Tilt Azimuth Nominal Power Module cost Technology Area Annual Yield Investment 30 deg 0 deg 20 kWp 14459.7 IDR/Wp Polycrystalline 133 m2 19.2 MWh/yr 1106919263 IDR Energy Cost 3216.7 IDR/kWh Page 27 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 Comparison Capacity Technology Mounting 20 kW Mono Flat Roof 20 kW Poly Flat Roof 20 kW Thin Flat Roof 20 kW Mono 20 kW Poly 20 kW Thin 20 kW Mono Façade or Tilted Roof Façade or Tilted Roof Façade or Tilted Roof Ground Based 20 kW Poly Ground Based 20 kW Thin Ground Based 20 kW Mono Flat Roof 20 kW Mono Flat Roof 20 kW MONO Flat Roof Ventilation Free Air Circulation Free Air Circulation Free Air Circulation Free Air Circulation Free Air Circulation Free Air Circulation Free Air Circulation Free Air Circulation Free Air Circulation Free Air Circulation Semi Integration Fully Insulated Module type Standard Area (m2) 125 Energy Yield (MWh/yr 23.6 Investment (IDR) 965157201 Standard 133 23.6 979900456 Standard 200 23.6 1097845885 Standard 125 23.6 1084236727 Standard 133 23.6 1106918657 Standard 200 23.6 1288374096 Standard 125 23.6 948145148 Standard 133 23.6 961754306 Standard 200 23.6 1070627569 Standard 125 23.6 965156595 Standard 125 23.4 965156595 Standard 125 22.9 965156595 Result of this simulation 1. Mono Technology: best approach with higher efficiency both investment and area 2. Ground Base Mounting: best approach for investment 3. Free Air Circulation Vent: best approach for energy yield Page 28 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 Preliminary design Standalone System Geographical Coordinates - Site and Meteo Page 29 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 - User’s Needs Consumption Hourly Distribution Page 30 of 42 - COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 System Page 31 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 • Result Evaluation Result Table Page 32 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 Comparison Capacity Technology Mounting 20 kW Mono Flat Roof 20 kW Poly Flat Roof 20 kW Thin Flat Roof 20 kW Mono 20 kW Poly 20 kW Thin 20 kW Mono Façade or Tilted Roof Façade or Tilted Roof Façade or Tilted Roof Ground Based 20 kW Poly Ground Based 20 kW Thin Ground Based 20 kW Mono Flat Roof 20 kW Mono Flat Roof 20 kW MONO Flat Roof Ventilation Free Air Circulation Free Air Circulation Free Air Circulation Free Air Circulation Free Air Circulation Free Air Circulation Free Air Circulation Free Air Circulation Free Air Circulation Free Air Circulation Semi Integration Fully Insulated Module type Standard Area (m2) 125 Energy Yield (MWh/yr 23.6 Investment (IDR) 965157201 Standard 133 23.6 979900456 Standard 200 23.6 1097845885 Standard 125 23.6 1084236727 Standard 133 23.6 1106918657 Standard 200 23.6 1288374096 Standard 125 23.6 948145148 Standard 133 23.6 961754306 Standard 200 23.6 1070627569 Standard 125 23.6 965156595 Standard 125 23.4 965156595 Standard 125 22.9 965156595 Result of this simulation 1. Mono Technology: best approach with higher efficiency both investment and area 2. Ground Base Mounting: best approach for investment 3. Free Air Circulation Vent: best approach for energy yield Page 33 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 Pumping System - Project Location Page 34 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 - System - Production and Use Graph ( Direct Coupling) Page 35 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 • Result Evaluation - Production and Use Graph (Dir. With current Booster) - Production and Use Graph (Cascading) Page 36 of 42 - COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 Production and Use Graph (MPPT Converter) Page 37 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 Project Design • 10 MW Grid Connected - Location Page 38 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 Page 39 of 42 - COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 System Design Page 40 of 42 COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 - Near Shading - Shading with Object Page 41 of 42 - COURSE REPORT : STUDENT ENRICH : DESIGN OF GRID CONNECTED AND STANDALONE PV PLANT DATE : 27-07-2020 to 01-08-2020 Result Page 42 of 42 PVSYST 7.0.7 09/08/20 Page 1/5 Grid-Connected System: Simulation parameters Project : Bagus Project 10 MW Solar PV Geographical Site Batan Situation Time defined as Latitude Legal Time Albedo Batan Meteo data: Country Indonesia 1.12° N Longitude 104.12° E Time zone UT+7 Altitude 0 m 0.20 Meteonorm 7.3, Sat=2% - Synthetic PVsyst TRIAL Simulation variant : New simulation variant Simulation date Simulation parameters Collector Plane Orientation Sheds configuration Shading limit angle Models used System type Tilt Nb. of sheds Sheds spacing Limit profile angle Transposition 09/08/20 01h29 Sheds on ground 30° 1075 2.20 m 64.9° Azimuth Identical arrays Collector width Ground Cov. Ratio (GCR) Hay Diffuse Circumsolar 0° 2.00 m 90.9% Perez, Meteonorm separate PVsyst TRIAL Horizon Near Shadings User's needs : Free Horizon Linear shadings Unlimited load (grid) PV Array Characteristics PV module Si-poly Model AE CQ P6/60 230 Original PVsyst database Manufacturer AE Solar Number of PV modules In series 24 modules In parallel Total number of PV modules nb. modules 4536 Unit Nom. Power Array global power Nominal (STC) 1043 kWp At operating cond. Array operating characteristics (50°C) U mpp 713 V I mpp Total area Module area 7380 m² Cell area 189 strings 230 Wp 1032 kWp (28°C) 1447 A 6622 m² Inverter Original PVsyst database Characteristics Inverter pack 550-875 V 1.04 PVsyst TRIAL Total Model Manufacturer Unit Nom. Power Total power Nb. of inverters RPS 1130 Master-Slave Bonfiglioli Vectron 1000 kWac Oper. Voltage 1000 kWac Pnom ratio 1 units Total power 1000 kWac Pnom ratio 1.04 PV Array loss factors Thermal Loss factor Uc (const) Wiring Ohmic Loss Global array res. Module Quality Loss Module mismatch losses Strings Mismatch loss Incidence effect, ASHRAE parametrization IAM = 20.0 W/m²K 7.5 mΩ Uv (wind) Loss Fraction Loss Fraction Loss Fraction Loss Fraction bo Param. 0.0 W/m²K / m/s 1.5 % at STC 1.5 % 2.0 % at MPP 0.10 % 0.05 PVsyst TRIAL PVsyst Evaluation mode 1 - bo (1/cos i - 1) PVSYST 7.0.7 09/08/20 Page 2/5 Grid-Connected System: Near shading definition Project : Bagus Project 10 MW Solar PV Simulation variant : New simulation variant Main system parameters System type Near Shadings PV Field Orientation PV modules PV Array Inverter User's needs Linear shadings tilt Model Nb. of modules Model Unlimited load (grid) Sheds on ground 30° azimuth AE CQ P6/60 230 Pnom 4536 Pnom total RPS 1130 Master-Slave Pnom 0° 230 Wp 1043 kWp 1000 kW ac PVsyst TRIAL Perspective of the PV-field and surrounding shading scene PVsyst TRIAL PVsyst TRIAL Iso-shadings diagram Bagus Project 10 MW Solar PV Beam shading factor (linear calculation) : Iso-shadings curves 90 4 Shading loss: 1% Shading loss: 5% Shading loss: 10% Shading loss: 20% Shading loss: 40% 75 Attenuation for diffuse: 0.160 and albedo: 0.870 3 5 12h 6 7 11h 13h 2 1 60 14h Sun height [°] 10h 45 15h 9h PVsyst TRIAL 30 8h 15 7h 16h 1: 22 june 2: 22 may - 23 july 3: 20 apr - 23 aug 4: 20 mar - 23 sep 5: 21 feb - 23 oct 6: 19 jan - 22 nov 7: 22 december 17h Behind the plane 0 -180 PVsyst Evaluation mode -150 -120 Behind the plane -90 -60 -30 0 Azimuth [°] 30 60 90 120 150 180 PVSYST 7.0.7 09/08/20 Page 3/ 5 Grid-Connected System: Main results Project : Bagus Project 10 MW Solar PV Simulation variant : New simulation variant Main system parameters System type Near Shadings PV Field Orientation PV modules PV Array Inverter User's needs Sheds on ground Linear shadings tilt Model Nb. of modules Model Unlimited load (grid) 30° azimuth AE CQ P6/60 230 Pnom 4536 Pnom total RPS 1130 Master-Slave Pnom 0° 230 Wp 1043 kWp 1000 kW ac 1127 MWh/year 73.35 % 1080 kWh/kWp/year PVsyst TRIAL Main simulation results System Production Produced Energy Performance Ratio PR Normalized productions (per installed kWp): Specific prod. Nominal power 1043 kWp Performance Ratio PR 6 1.0 PR: Performance Ratio (Yf / Yr) : 0.734 Lc: Collection Loss (PV-array losses) Ls: System Loss (inverter, ...) Yf: Produced useful energy (inverter output) 0.8 0.7 4 Performance Ratio PR [kWh/kWp/day] 5 0.9 1.02 kWh/kWp/day 0.05 kWh/kWp/day 2.96 kWh/kWp/day Normalized Energy PVsyst TRIAL 3 2 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 1 0.1 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 0.0 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec New simulation variant Balances and main results GlobHor DiffHor T_Amb GlobI nc GlobEff kWh/ m² 139.9 EArray E_Grid PR kWh/ m² °C kWh/ m² kWh/ m² MWh MWh ratio 75.39 26.91 147.5 130.1 115.0 112.9 0.734 144.2 77.58 27.56 144.7 129.3 114.3 112.3 0.744 151.2 84.90 27.97 138.7 122.4 109.0 107.1 0.740 137.8 76.26 28.09 116.8 101.8 91.2 89.6 0.735 133.5 75.48 28.92 105.6 90.4 81.5 80.0 0.727 130.2 70.62 28.29 97.9 83.3 75.5 74.1 0.726 136.8 73.56 28.34 104.4 89.0 80.6 79.2 0.727 140.1 74.50 28.27 113.4 98.6 88.8 87.2 0.736 134.5 78.18 27.80 120.2 105.2 94.3 92.7 0.739 136.8 87.10 28.19 132.3 115.7 103.3 101.4 0.735 117.9 71.90 27.19 120.9 106.1 94.0 92.3 0.732 123.6 77.32 27.18 130.6 112.5 100.2 98.4 0.722 PVsyst TRIAL January February March April May June July August September October November December PVsyst TRIAL Year Legends: PVsyst Evaluation mode 1626.4 922.79 27.90 1473.0 1284.5 1147.8 1127.2 0.734 GlobHor Global horizontal irradiation GlobEff Effective Global, corr. for I AM and shadings DiffHor Horizontal diffuse irradiation EArray Effective energy at the output of the array T_Amb T amb. E_Grid Energy injected into grid GlobI nc Global incident in coll. plane PR Performance Ratio PVSYST 7.0.7 09/08/20 Page 4/5 Grid-Connected System: Special graphs Project : Bagus Project 10 MW Solar PV Simulation variant : New simulation variant Main system parameters Near Shadings PV Field Orientation PV modules PV Array Inverter User's needs System type Linear shadings tilt Model Nb. of modules Model Unlimited load (grid) Sheds on ground 30° azimuth AE CQ P6/60 230 Pnom 4536 Pnom total RPS 1130 Master-Slave Pnom 0° 230 Wp 1043 kWp 1000 kW ac PVsyst TRIAL Daily Input/Output diagram 7000 Values from 01/01 to 31/12 grid [kWh/day] 6000 5000 PVsyst TRIAL injected 3000 Energy into 4000 2000 1000 0 0 2 4 6 Global incident in coll. plane [kWh/m²/day] 8 10 PVsyst TRIAL System Output Power Distribution 30000 25000 20000 injected into grid [kWh / Bin] Values from 01/01 to 31/12 15000 Energy PVsyst TRIAL 10000 5000 0 PVsyst Evaluation mode 0 200 400 600 Power injected into grid [kW] 800 1000 PVSYST 7.0.7 09/08/20 Page 5/5 Grid-Connected System: Loss diagram Project : Bagus Project 10 MW Solar PV Simulation variant : New simulation variant Main system parameters System type Near Shadings PV Field Orientation PV modules PV Array Inverter User's needs Linear shadings tilt Model Nb. of modules Model Unlimited load (grid) Sheds on ground 30° azimuth AE CQ P6/60 230 Pnom 4536 Pnom total RPS 1130 Master-Slave Pnom 0° 230 Wp 1043 kWp 1000 kW ac PVsyst TRIAL Loss diagram over the whole year 1626 kWh/m² Global horizontal irradiation -9.43% -9.69% -3.44% 1284 kWh/m² * 7380 m² coll. Global incident in coll. plane Near Shadings: irradiance loss IAM factor on global Effective irradiation on collectors efficiency at STC = 14.14% PV conversion PVsyst TRIAL 1340 MWh -1.10% Array nominal energy (at STC effic.) PV loss due to irradiance level -9.48% PV loss due to temperature -1.50% Module quality loss -2.10% Mismatch loss, modules and strings -0.81% 1148 MWh -1.78% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% -0.01% 0.00% Ohmic wiring loss Array virtual energy at MPP Inverter Loss during operation (efficiency) Inverter Loss over nominal inv. power Inverter Loss due to max. input current Inverter Loss over nominal inv. voltage Inverter Loss due to power threshold Inverter Loss due to voltage threshold Available Energy at Inverter Output Energy injected into grid PVsyst TRIAL 1127 MWh 1127 MWh PVsyst TRIAL PVsyst Evaluation mode
