ABSTRAK Nur Fadhilah Nusbah, STB: H1A13114

ABSTRAK
Nur Fadhilah Nusbah, STB: H1A13114, Tanggung Gugat Kerugian
Immateril Akibat Ingkar Janji Kawin Ditinjau Dari Kitab Undang-Undang
Hukum Perdata Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor
149k/Pdt/2008, di bawah bimbingan Bapak Guswan Hakim, sebagai
pembimbing I dan Bapak Haris Yusuf, sebagai pembimbing II.
Tujuan dari penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui apakah janji kawin yang
dimaksud dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 149k/Pdt/2008 telah sesuai
dengan prinsip-prinsip hukum perjanjian dan apakah kerugian immateril akibat
adanya janji kawin dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 149k/Pdt/2008 dapat
dimintai pertanggung jawaban sesuai dengan Pasal 58 KUHPerdata.
Tipe penelitian ini adalah penulisan normatif. Bahwa dalam penelitian ini
berpedoman kepada peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku (hukum positif)
yang relevan dengan masalah yang diteliti serta berkaitan dengan kenyataan yang
harus diteliti.
Penelitian ini menghasilkan kesimpulan yaitu : pertimbangan hakim
Pengadilan Tinggi Sulawesi Tenggara dan Pertimbangan Hakim Mahkamah
Agung didalam amar putusannya yang menyatakan perbuatan janji kawin yang
dilakukan tergugat adalah wanprestasi/cidera janji tidaklah tepat, karena janji
kawin yang diucapkan tergugat tidak memenuhi Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Perjanjian
dan unsur-unsur syarat sah perjanjian dalam pasal 1320 KUHPerdata sehingga
bukan suatu perbuatan wanprestasi/cidera janji melainkan perbuatan melawan
hukum.
Pertimbangan hakim Pengadilan Tinggi Sulawesi Tenggara dan
Pertimbangan Hakim Mahkamah Agung yang menyatakan tergugat wajib
membayar ganti kerugian immaterial kepada penggugat tidak sesuai dengan pasal
58 KUHPerdata, karena janji kawin yang diucapkan tergugat tidak dapat dimintai
pertanggung jawaban berupa ganti kerugian karena janji kawin tersebut tidak
disertai dengan adanya pengumuman kawin dimuka umum, melainkan ganti
kerugian karena perbuatan melawan hukum.
BSTRACT
Nur Fadhilah Nusbah, Stb: H1A113114, Liability for Immaterial Loss
Due to the Denial of Premarital Agreement Reviewed from Indonesian Civil
Code Based on Supreme Court Verdict Number 149k/Pdt/2008, under the
guidance of Mr. Guswan Hakim as first supervisor and Mr. Haris Yusuf as
second supervisor.
The purpose of this research is to know if a premarital agreement in the
Supreme Court Verdict No. 149k/Pdt/2008 was appropriate to the principles of
legal agreements and if immaterial loss caused by a denial of premarital
agreement based in the Supreme Court Verdict No. 149k/Pdt/2008 could be held
liable pursuant to Article 58 of the Indonesian Civil Code.
This research uses a normative legal research method. Which is a method
that refers to regulations that is still valid (positive law) and relevant to the issue
being observed and also related to the facts which is being observed.
This research concludes that: both the appellate court judges’
consideration and the Supreme Court judges’ consideration in the verdict stated
that the premarital agreement made by the defendant as a breach of contract was
not appropriate, because the premarital agreement made by the defendant doesn't
meet the principle requirements pursuant to article 1320 of the Indonesian civil
code so it was not a breach of contract but instead as a tort.
The appellate court judges’ consideration and the Supreme Court judges’
consideration that stated the defendant must give compensation to the plaintiffs
immaterial loss was not accordant to article 58 of the Indonesian civil code,
because of the defendants premarital agreement liability, which is in a form of
compensation, cannot be held liable because the premarital agreement wasn't
publicly announced but rather than it was a compensation given because of a tort.